|
Matthew 5: 27-30
In the last fifteen years or so, we in America
have become much more acquainted than we were with the cultures of the Middle
East. Among the many contrasts that have stood out, one of the
most startling to our liberated Western society is the way women are regarded -
and how they regarded themselves - in some of those countries.
Of course, the
extreme repression of women under the Taliban in Afghanistan
got the most press, but the same climate was seen in many places. In the more
strict places, single women may be allowed to wear colorful dresses, albeit
modest ones, and show their faces on occasion in public. This is the dating
stage, when men are choosing wives. But once the choice is made, and there is
engagement, and that leads to marriage, everything changes. The woman now wears
a gray, drab birka, that covers her entire body, including her face. From then
on, she is only seen by her husband. She becomes his possession.
Needless to say, Western women, when they became more
aware of how women were treated in the Middle East, saw
it as an outrage. These women needed to be liberated. And so we were startled
when some of those women were actually interviewed, and said they liked the way
they were treated just fine. They had lifetime security, and they couldn't
imagine why Western women wanted to do the same things that the men had to do.
Different strokes...
The Bible that we read and revere is a product of the Middle
East, and there are many times that we can't really understand the
Bible unless we take that into account. What the Bible teaches about women and
marriage is a case in point. When the Bible was written, marriage was, by and
large, about property and position - and while it served both men and women, it
was an arrangement between men. We see this in stories like that of Jacob, who
had to work fourteen years for his father-in-law Laban, in order to win his
Laban's daughter's hand in marriage. And, we still have vestiges of this in our
customs - asking the father of the bride for her hand in marriage, or the "Giving
of the Bride" by the father in the traditional wedding ceremony. Nothing
wrong with following those traditional gestures - couples still choose to do so
- but they are echoes of a time when marriage was an arrangement made between
men.
And adultery, as it was defined in the time of the Bible,
was breaking the arrangement. The understanding was that married men were free
to have sexual adventures, as long as it was with a slave woman, an unmarried
woman, or with a foreign woman, whether she was married or not. None of those
situations was considered adultery. Adultery was having an affair with the wife
of another Jewish man - because then you were stealing his property.
It's important to know some of that background, because
when we look at the Bible from our 21st century perspective, we see a total
double standard when it comes to men and women; it looks to us like the Bible
is hopelessly sexist, and even cruel to women. In fact, what we see in the Bible is amazing
strides in beginning to break the shackles of that male-dominated system.
We begin to see some of that in the Old Testament, where
women begin to have some rights surrounding divorce; but we especially see it
in Jesus. Someone has said that every time Jesus talked with a woman in the New
Testament, he broke down another social barrier by which they were seen as
second-class citizens.
And I believe the teaching in today's scripture lesson
also breaks down barriers. It is part of the Sermon on the Mount, and Jesus is
engaged in a project we've been talking about for the last couple weeks -
reinterpreting the Old Testament law in a way that takes it beyond just
following rules, and makes it a matter of offering our whole heart to God. This
time it's about the commandment on adultery.
"You have heard that it was said," said Jesus,
"'You shall not commit adultery.'" We see this commandment, and
rightly so, as relating to faithfulness in marriage. I believe that's the way
God would want us to see it, and wants us to honor our marriages with complete
fidelity. But as I've already shared, Jewish men didn't have to be faithful-
they simply had to honor another man's property. And that's the way some of the
men might have heard the commandment in Jesus' day. That doesn't apply to
me. One of the obvious times that this law was interpreted in favor of the
male is in John 8, when the men brought before Jesus a woman caught in the act
of adultery. That's the time when Jesus responded, "Let he who is without
sin cast the first stone." And he let her go free. The thing about that
story is the obvious question that doesn't get asked: where was the man? Why
was he not accused? Simply because that's not how things were done - men
protected each other.
All this gender double standard is part of the scene
Jesus is addressing. So a man can stand there pretty smug when Jesus raises the
subject. Until they hear what Jesus says next: "But I say to you that
every one who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with
her in his heart." What does that mean?
First of all, it is addressed to men. If you look at a
woman... So, this is not a case where the woman will be accused, and the man
conveniently disappear. Jesus is specifically holding men accountable here.
Second of all, the subject here is any woman - not just a fellow Jew's wife.
Even a slave woman, even a foreign woman are given dignity - are off limits
now.
And then, of course, the third point - the shocking,
obvious one: the culprit here is not just wrong action - it's wrong attitudes.
The whole argument of, It's okay if I look, as long as I don't touch - Jesus
shoots it down. So what is Jesus saying exactly here? We know, that as human
beings, part of God's nature - we are wired to be attracted to the opposite
sex. Certainly Jesus is not saying that that's a bad thing in and of itself. We
also know, from the Bible, and from the experience of being human, that human
sexuality is a great gift from God - and has the potential of great blessing.
Certainly Jesus is saying nothing here to put that in a negative light.
What Jesus is talking about is lust. The Bible dictionary
I use defines lust as 'burning with sexual desire." Again, sexual desire,
in and of itself, is not necessarily evil. What is evil is what sexual desire
has become in our society - a focus on body parts, rather than on personhood. A
focus on the physical, rather than the spiritual. I believe the problem with
the lust Jesus was addressing is that when we see someone in that light, we
don't see them as human beings. We see them as second-class commodities. And
Jesus said that men simply are not to regard women that way.
And we might think that we've graduated from that
thinking; we might think that we are much more enlightened than those Middle
East people 2000 years ago. But look again. All around us women
are still regarded as sex objects without souls. Just this past week, one of
the popular cop shows on TV had the story of a woman who was murdered, it
turned out, by a high-ranking official, and as the men talked it over, one said
to the other, "You mean you're going to arrest one of the best men in our
community just because some prostitute died?" The attitude is still there,
folks, and Jesus will not have it. Every person is a child of God, and not just
a body to be used. Every person - male and female - has the breath of God
within, and when we reduce people to sex objects, we are not honoring what God
has made.
It is a sinful world, we know that. And one of the real
signs of that is how we have taken human sexuality, one of the truly beautiful
gifts God ever dreamed up, and made it into one of the most destructive forces
in the world. Homes are wrecked, diseases are spread, people lose self-respect,
souls are crushed - all because of the perversion of something that God
intended to be good. We simply are not intended to look upon one another as
body parts; as creatures of lust; as sex objects. Animals may do that; it may
be nature's way. But we are not mere animals; and there is a higher law we
follow than simple nature. The Bible says we were created in the very image of
God; and that means we put a higher standard on ourselves, and regard others in
a higher way.
I am reading the Sermon on the Mount of Jesus as a recipe
for deeper living - and one of the ingredients certainly must be living by a
moral code - and this is something much wider in scope than sexuality, as
important as that is. This comes down to what kind of person you will be, how
you will treat others, and how you'll keep your life presentable before God.
Our prayer through this Lenten season has been that God would create within us
a clean heart, and renew a right spirit within us.
And so, as we come before God today, and share in the
sacred meal Jesus began with his disciples, we ask that God will create in each
of us a heart of love and respect, that we might love God and our neighbor with
the highest standard and the deepest appreciation. We lose so much of that in
our society by our obsession with physical attractiveness and sex for its own
sake. God created human sexuality, the male-ness or the female-ness of each of
us, as a gift that is intimately part of who we are as people - something to
celebrate.
Improper lust does not fit into that picture. If we apply
the teaching of Jesus very specifically, he would be calling those who are
addicted to pornography to get help; those who are considering adultery to
reconsider; those who excuse in themselves sexual phrases to refer to other
people, or fantasies that seem harmless - be aware of what Jesus is saying here
- what happens in our minds are small steps to what can actually ruin lives.
And in general, let all of us be aware of God's love for each person,
and treat each other in every arena of life with integrity and godly love.
Finally, let us love our selves for who God made us to be
- not trying to live up to some impossible physical standard - but precious in
God's sight as the beautiful, sensual, loving creations he made us to be. In
God's family nobody is second-class; everybody is invited to the table.
|